After recently reading an article in The Telegraph which can be found here:
It raised the question, “Is it ever okay to harm, or kill someone?”
The ethics in this case appear to be situational, for example, if you are at risk, then yes, however if it is simply for the sake of harming another this is not ethically acceptable.
David Cameron UK Prime Minister is currently trying to provide householders who are confronted with force with more legal protection. The current law states that anyone in England and Wales can use “reasonable force” to protect themselves or others. Householders are protected from prosecution as long as they act “honestly and instinctively.”
“When a burglar invades your home they give up their rights.”
An issue is rarely straight forward, which is the case for this one in particular. By changing the amount of force the law allows, there may be repercussions. It is argued that providing people with more rights to fight back may have the opposite effect than intended in which people may take advantage of their new found lenience. For example, knowing that they are more protected in terms of using self-defence, people may use this inappropriately as they feel they would then be held unaccountable for their actions and can claim their actions were defensive when in reality they were not.
However, the possible change in law does state that it is okay to fight back as long as it is not with “grossly disproportionate force.” I feel that this statement provides boundaries for this potential issue as it proves that there will still be consequences if things were to go beyond self-defence.
To further complicate things, if the change were to take place, it is a possibility that it may increase violence on both sides of the spectrum.
Does this mean burglars will come more prepared with weapons knowing that householders may be more likely to fight back?
Will this lead to more victims being killed trying to oppose the burglars?
It is a difficult issue as it may ultimately encourage people to fight back which may be harmful or fatal. However, I feel that the change in law is more about educating people about their rights, dispelling any doubts about what they are able to do to protect themselves and what they are not.
Do you think Cameron is acting as the householders Superman, or is this the start of a more violent culture?
Written by Amy Lee.